INTERMEDIATE PAIRS Friday Aft Session October 3, 2008
Scores after 30 boards Average: 50.0 Section A North-South
Pair Pct Score Section Rank MPs
A B C
5 58.93 58.93 A 1 0.48(A) Misuzu McManus - Sue Grouch
2 57.51 57.51 A 2 0.34(A) Emily Hugo - Shelby Chapdelaine
4 49.64 49.64 A Judy Mathis - Frank Fisher
1 48.13 48.13 B 1 0.24(B) Connie Murtaugh - Mary Swinburne
3 44.26 44.26 C Christina Adkins Murray - Walter Murray
6 43.00 43.00 B Mary Ann Echelberry - Vivian Heading
INTERMEDIATE PAIRS Friday Aft Session October 3, 2008
Scores after 30 boards Average: 50.0 Section A East-West
Pair Pct Score Section Rank MPs
A B C
2 60.88 60.88 A 1 0.48(A) Sidney Sandifer - Robert Renuart
5 58.33 58.33 B 2 1 0.34(A) Roger Koehler - John Ridenour
4 58.01 58.01 A William McManus - Pauline Grant
6 50.00 50.00 C 2 1 0.22(B) June Foster - Joanne Kunz
3 37.89 37.89 C Rita Share - Vijey Jain
1 36.26 36.26 C Carol Legum - Pat Carlson
RESULTS OF BOARD 1
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
420 2.00 2.00 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 1-Legum-Carlson
920 3.00 1.00 3-Murray-Murray vs 4-McManus-Grant
50 1.00 3.00 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 6-Foster-Kunz
990 4.00 0.00 5-McManus-Grouch vs 3-Share-Jain
100 0.00 4.00 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 5-Koehler-Ridenour
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 2
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 3.50 0.50 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 1-Legum-Carlson
90 2.00 2.00 3-Murray-Murray vs 4-McManus-Grant
200 0.00 4.00 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 6-Foster-Kunz
50 3.50 0.50 5-McManus-Grouch vs 3-Share-Jain
130 1.00 3.00 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 5-Koehler-Ridenour
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 3
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 1-Legum-Carlson
600 1.00 3.00 3-Murray-Murray vs 4-McManus-Grant
50 3.00 1.00 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 6-Foster-Kunz
600 1.00 3.00 5-McManus-Grouch vs 3-Share-Jain
600 1.00 3.00 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 5-Koehler-Ridenour
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 4
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
90 1.00 3.00 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 1-Legum-Carlson
200 0.00 4.00 3-Murray-Murray vs 4-McManus-Grant
100 2.00 2.00 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 6-Foster-Kunz
120 3.00 1.00 5-McManus-Grouch vs 3-Share-Jain
300 4.00 0.00 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 5-Koehler-Ridenour
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 5
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 3.50 0.50 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 1-Legum-Carlson
100 0.50 3.50 3-Murray-Murray vs 4-McManus-Grant
620 3.50 0.50 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 6-Foster-Kunz
100 0.50 3.50 5-McManus-Grouch vs 3-Share-Jain
500 2.00 2.00 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 5-Koehler-Ridenour
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 6
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 2.50 1.50 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 6-Foster-Kunz
200 2.50 1.50 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
200 2.50 1.50 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 5-Koehler-Ridenour
200 2.50 1.50 5-McManus-Grouch vs 1-Legum-Carlson
150 0.00 4.00 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 4-McManus-Grant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 7
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
600 0.50 3.50 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 6-Foster-Kunz
200 3.50 0.50 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
600 0.50 3.50 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 5-Koehler-Ridenour
100 2.00 2.00 5-McManus-Grouch vs 1-Legum-Carlson
200 3.50 0.50 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 4-McManus-Grant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 8
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
420 1.00 3.00 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 6-Foster-Kunz
420 1.00 3.00 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
400 3.00 1.00 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 5-Koehler-Ridenour
170 4.00 0.00 5-McManus-Grouch vs 1-Legum-Carlson
420 1.00 3.00 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 4-McManus-Grant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 9
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
170 1.00 3.00 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 6-Foster-Kunz
140 2.50 1.50 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
620 0.00 4.00 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 5-Koehler-Ridenour
100 4.00 0.00 5-McManus-Grouch vs 1-Legum-Carlson
140 2.50 1.50 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 4-McManus-Grant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 10
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 0.00 4.00 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 6-Foster-Kunz
110 3.50 0.50 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
170 1.50 2.50 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 5-Koehler-Ridenour
110 3.50 0.50 5-McManus-Grouch vs 1-Legum-Carlson
170 1.50 2.50 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 4-McManus-Grant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 11
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 3.00 1.00 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 5-Koehler-Ridenour
110 0.00 4.00 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 1-Legum-Carlson
100 4.00 0.00 3-Murray-Murray vs 3-Share-Jain
PASS 2.00 2.00 5-McManus-Grouch vs 6-Foster-Kunz
100 1.00 3.00 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 12
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 2.50 1.50 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 5-Koehler-Ridenour
200 1.00 3.00 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 1-Legum-Carlson
650 4.00 0.00 3-Murray-Murray vs 3-Share-Jain
620 2.50 1.50 5-McManus-Grouch vs 6-Foster-Kunz
100 0.00 4.00 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 13
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1430 1.50 2.50 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 5-Koehler-Ridenour
680 4.00 0.00 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 1-Legum-Carlson
1470 0.00 4.00 3-Murray-Murray vs 3-Share-Jain
710 3.00 1.00 5-McManus-Grouch vs 6-Foster-Kunz
1430 1.50 2.50 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 14
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 1.00 3.00 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 5-Koehler-Ridenour
130 3.50 0.50 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 1-Legum-Carlson
100 2.00 2.00 3-Murray-Murray vs 3-Share-Jain
130 3.50 0.50 5-McManus-Grouch vs 6-Foster-Kunz
300 0.00 4.00 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 15
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 2.00 2.00 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 5-Koehler-Ridenour
120 3.00 1.00 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 1-Legum-Carlson
790 4.00 0.00 3-Murray-Murray vs 3-Share-Jain
200 0.50 3.50 5-McManus-Grouch vs 6-Foster-Kunz
200 0.50 3.50 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 16
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 1.00 3.00 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 3-Share-Jain
200 3.50 0.50 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 6-Foster-Kunz
200 3.50 0.50 3-Murray-Murray vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
50 0.00 4.00 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 4-McManus-Grant
140 2.00 2.00 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 1-Legum-Carlson
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 17
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
980 0.50 3.50 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 3-Share-Jain
480 3.00 1.00 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 6-Foster-Kunz
980 0.50 3.50 3-Murray-Murray vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
480 3.00 1.00 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 4-McManus-Grant
480 3.00 1.00 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 1-Legum-Carlson
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 18
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 3-Share-Jain
140 3.00 1.00 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 6-Foster-Kunz
50 0.00 4.00 3-Murray-Murray vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
100 1.00 3.00 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 4-McManus-Grant
130 2.00 2.00 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 1-Legum-Carlson
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 19
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 3.00 1.00 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 3-Share-Jain
150 0.00 4.00 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 6-Foster-Kunz
110 1.00 3.00 3-Murray-Murray vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
200 3.00 1.00 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 4-McManus-Grant
200 3.00 1.00 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 1-Legum-Carlson
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 20
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
660 2.00 2.00 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 3-Share-Jain
100 4.00 0.00 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 6-Foster-Kunz
720 0.00 4.00 3-Murray-Murray vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
690 1.00 3.00 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 4-McManus-Grant
650 3.00 1.00 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 1-Legum-Carlson
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 21
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 2.50 1.50 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
120 1.00 3.00 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 4-McManus-Grant
150 2.50 1.50 3-Murray-Murray vs 1-Legum-Carlson
200 4.00 0.00 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 3-Share-Jain
90 0.00 4.00 5-McManus-Grouch vs 5-Koehler-Ridenour
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 22
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 1.38 2.63 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
120 2.63 1.38 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 4-McManus-Grant
PASS 0.13 3.88 3-Murray-Murray vs 1-Legum-Carlson
430 3.88 0.13 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 3-Share-Jain
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 23
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
680 0.75 3.25 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
680 0.75 3.25 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 4-McManus-Grant
650 2.63 1.38 3-Murray-Murray vs 1-Legum-Carlson
200 3.88 0.13 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 3-Share-Jain
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 24
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1020 3.25 0.75 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
990 1.38 2.63 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 4-McManus-Grant
1020 3.25 0.75 3-Murray-Murray vs 1-Legum-Carlson
100 0.13 3.88 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 3-Share-Jain
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 25
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 0.75 3.25 1-Murtaugh-Swinburne vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
200 3.25 0.75 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 4-McManus-Grant
100 0.75 3.25 3-Murray-Murray vs 1-Legum-Carlson
200 3.25 0.75 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 3-Share-Jain
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 26
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 4.00 0.00 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 3-Share-Jain
140 1.50 2.50 3-Murray-Murray vs 5-Koehler-Ridenour
100 0.00 4.00 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
140 1.50 2.50 5-McManus-Grouch vs 4-McManus-Grant
150 3.00 1.00 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 6-Foster-Kunz
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 27
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 0.50 3.50 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 3-Share-Jain
PASS 3.00 1.00 3-Murray-Murray vs 5-Koehler-Ridenour
50 2.00 2.00 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
200 4.00 0.00 5-McManus-Grouch vs 4-McManus-Grant
100 0.50 3.50 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 6-Foster-Kunz
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 28
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 1.50 2.50 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 3-Share-Jain
110 1.50 2.50 3-Murray-Murray vs 5-Koehler-Ridenour
100 4.00 0.00 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
200 0.00 4.00 5-McManus-Grouch vs 4-McManus-Grant
50 3.00 1.00 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 6-Foster-Kunz
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 29
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
710 2.50 1.50 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 3-Share-Jain
710 2.50 1.50 3-Murray-Murray vs 5-Koehler-Ridenour
1460 0.00 4.00 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
1430 1.00 3.00 5-McManus-Grouch vs 4-McManus-Grant
230 4.00 0.00 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 6-Foster-Kunz
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS OF BOARD 30
SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES
N-S E-W N-S E-W
400 2.00 2.00 2-Hugo-Chapdelaine vs 3-Share-Jain
200 1.00 3.00 3-Murray-Murray vs 5-Koehler-Ridenour
430 3.50 0.50 4-Mathis-Fisher vs 2-Sandifer-Renuart
430 3.50 0.50 5-McManus-Grouch vs 4-McManus-Grant
100 0.00 4.00 6-Echelberry-Heading vs 6-Foster-Kunz
----------------------------------------------------------------------